Sunday, 22 December 2013

How it achieves is more important for AAP then How much it achieves.

Whenever we take any decision we should spent time and efforts to consider as many inputs (conditions) as possible before opting for one opinion.


We must not change the decision even if there is addition or deletion of few minor inputs.


BUT WE MUST RECONSIDER OUR OPINION IF THERE IS EMERGENCE OF ONE OR MORE NEW MAJOR INPUTS (CONDITIONS).


We must consider present scenario of -
 -BJP + Congress + Part of media questioning AAP's ability to run the Govt.
 -First time in history one political party is pushing for "UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT" publicly.


If some one considers these as minor inputs then he should remain against formation of Govt.


In my view these two are major inputs, so I'm NOW in favour of formation of Govt by AAP.


Had AAP went for some closed door negotiations or acceptance of terms and conditions for getting support for formation of Govt, definitely all would have been against it.


But now situation is totally different, if Congress pull the support, it will be Congress who will be loser.


If AAP forms the Govt, common men all over India will watch how it runs the Govt.

AAP will need less effort for LOKSAVA election.


Common men in Delhi and all over India will not evaluate AAP by what it achieve in next six months but they will give points for how honestly it puts its effort in fulfilling its promises and how it runs the Govt.


Suppose if AAP remains unable even after its honest effort - to provide 50% cheaper electricity & 700 Lit of water per capita- it will hardly lose 1-2% of its support in Delhi for it.

But if its MLAs remain connected with their voters, if they travel by DTC buses or other public transports,  if they don't scare people by Red beacon, armed security guards, if they remain cast, religion neutral, if they stick to rule of law or instantly punish if someone from AAP go against Law- they will win more support in Delhi and all over India.
AAP MUST FORM GOVT AND STICK TO TRANSPARENCY AND HONESTY IT WILL HELP IT FOR LOKSAVA ELECTION.

Wednesday, 18 December 2013

If AAP forms Govt. it will get benefited for Loksava election

It is not the matter of Delhi for which AAP should decide to form Govt. It should take decision considering Loksava election.

IN MY VIEW IT SHOULD FORM GOVT. AND PUT SINCERE EFFORT IN FULFILLING ITS PROMISES.
WHATEVER BE THE RESULT IF IT SHOWS ITS GOOD INTENTION AND EFFORT IN FULFILLING ITS PROMISES IT WILL NEED LESS EFFORT FOR LOKSAVA ELLECTION.  

Transparency & Honesty are the tools of AAP till now. Whatever decision it will take, either to form Govt. or not to form, if it will continue on same path of honesty & transparency, it will win heart of common men.
If it forms Govt. & remain unable to fulfill all the promises upto 100% level, even after its sincere effort in that direction, opposition will make hue & cry but public will stay supporting it. What matters more is your intention & effort, not only the result.
If it get support for full 5 years then along with AAP, Congress will also get benefited; if not, then Congress will become history.
 
If it wants to go for election-it will need less effort-
-need less then 19 Crore because it is well known now,
-media will give more time then it used to give to previously,
-will get those votes also which were anti-Congress and went to BJP or anti-BJP and went to Congress, because win-ability of AAP was a question.

Sunday, 15 December 2013

Should Delhi voters be afraid of reelection?

Should Delhi voters be afraid of reelection?
-Politics till now is a profitable business, invest once in every 5 years and earn jackpot for next five years.
-Politics till now was a very high investment business, it needed Crores of rupees.
-Politics till now was a highly payed job in which you have to visit in your constituency with folded hand once every five years and then scare common men by your power, by red beacon light, armed security guard, blockade of roads for VIP vehicles etc. 

If election happens every six months or every one year due to hung assembly. -- 
            -politics will become loss making business because of high initial investment cost and less time for recovery.
            -it will become low profile job because politicians have to visit constituency regularly and pay regard to voters always.

Whatever Govt. & political parties will spend will go to common men who makes banners, posters etc.

Why to fear from frequent elections. It will weed out unethical, power hungry and corrupt politicians and person who is interested in real social service will remain in politics. Then there will not be any hung Assembly. And all money invested by Govt. for repeat elections will be recovered within few years due to honest politics.

No one should doubt about intention of Anna & Kejriwal

Both Team Anna and AAP is necessary for India. And it is good they are now on different plateform.
Anna tries to oppose misdeed of others by using Hunger strike (Ansan) and agrees to take lokpal in installment like Mahatma Gandhi opted for Independence during freedom struggle. 

While AAP and team Kejriwal are like Bhagat Singh & Aazad; they want to take it by fighting head-on (through electoral politics). In modified word of Lokmanya Tilak they can say- Aazadi (Janlokpal) hamara janmsiddh aadhikar hai or hum ise lekar rahenge. They can also use Nehru's Lahore speech- Purnswaraj (janlokpal) se kam kuchh bhi nahi.

Yes,  there is difference of opinion but no one from AAP or Team Anna should doubt about others intention. 
Goal of both is same and both are honest.

You may opt to travel from Delhi to Mumbai via- air/ Rail or Road. If path is correct every one will reach at destination sooner or later.  If you want to reach early you have to spend more (energy).

AAP is ready to do struggle for more, they may reach early to Janlokpal destination.


It is good that AAP & Team Anna got separated

Yes, it was due to some divine intervention that resulted in Anna's separation from AAP and his continuation to lead reform through non-electoral politics.

In future it will be beneficial for India.

For sustained good results, honesty should not be the USP of only one political party. All political parties should adopt it.

If Baba Ramdev endorses BJP, or if someone from Team Anna wants to join any political party, nothing bad in that until basic ideology remains honesty.

Almost all political parties have some honest persons but their opinion does not keep much weight in the party forum during decision making.

Team Anna and other similar movements provide a good stage for all honest persons with different political ideology.

If Team Anna joins politics along with AAP, there will not be any stage for honest persons which have different opinion then AAP on different subjects.

Suppose if someone opts for separate Telangana or some resist it.  We can't categorize any one of them as dishonest until their opinion is based on honesty and not on personal gain.
AAP is considered as honest party. Suppose if it opts to oppose IPC-377, then everyone who is against it could not be considered as dishonest.

Team Anna and other similar stages are necessary to support policy of honesty among common man. It will give strength to all political parties in electoral politics, if they opt for path of honesty by intention & by act, as it helped AAP.

After 66 years of independence, politics went to such a low moral level that no political parties ever thought of winning an elections without using Cast, Religion, Muscle power, Black money, Alcohol, Distribution of Laptop, TV, spending crores of Rupees etc.

Success of AAP for next 5-10 years is necessary to implement Team Anna's policy & to raise the voice of honest persons in all other political parties.

Now all political parties will believe that they can adopt policies of AAP safely in Urban & Metropolitan areas. If AAP will show similar results in rural areas and assembly elections of  States far away from Delhi, it will help other parties also to adopt similar policies without fear of loss.

AAP is a research product of R & D lab of Team Anna, if it succeeds, all other political parties will imitate AAP.  And we should welcome this change.
But if AAP fails, all other parties will keep doing what they are doing till now, with greater force and without fear of any loss.

Failure of AAP will result in failure of Team Anna.

It is AAP who experimented successfully the use of TRANCEPARENCY & HONESTY as tools for political gain. Now other party may follow. Without evidence of this successful experiment no other party was ready to follow Team Anna's path.





Saturday, 14 December 2013

AAP & Team Anna are not antagonistic

It appears same situation as it had been during freedom struggle – Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru  & Bhagat Singh, Netaji .

Goal was same but path were different.

AS A COMMON MAN I CAN’T LEAVE TEAM ANNA, EVEN IF KEJRIWAL TELLS WHY ANNA IS SUPPORTNG JOKPAL, SIMILARLY I CAN’T LEAVE AAP AND KEJRIWAL, EVEN IF ANNA TELLS POLITICS IS DIRTY GAME. 

IN MY VIEW IT IS GOOD FOR INDIA WHEN SOME HONEST PERSONS OPTED FOR MOVEMENT PATH AND SOME OPTED FOR ELECTORAL POLITICS.
BOTH AAP AND TEAM ANNA ON SAME STAGE (EITHER ELECTORAL OR NONELECTORAL) WOULD HAVE ACHIEVED LESS THEN WHAT SEEMS POSSIBLE NOW.


Even after formation of strong lokpal we will need both Team Anna & AAP. Both are not antagonistic they are complimentary to each other. Without Anna’s movement AAP couldn’t be born and won election. Without pressure from AAP Lokpal would never be a reality. 
If we remove Team Anna’s movement for Lokpal from history-
- AAP alone could never been able to mobilise public in its favour,
- it could never be able to get donations and support from all over the world,
- it was not possible for AAP to get time & space in media.

Similarly- 

Before AAP’s spectacular performance in the Delhi election- 
-it was not possible for anyone to get Lokpal bill passed by present parliament,
-it was not possible for anyone to get unconditional support from MLA to form Govt.
-it was not possible to witness the situation where all political parties avoid horse trading to form the Govt. & prefer to sit in opposition then to form the Govt. 

Before declaration of Delhi Assembly Result, no major political parties taken Anna’s proposed fast seriously. Select committee submitted its report in November-2012, but nothing was done in 2012 winter session. Now they are in hurry to pass Lokpal bill as early as possible and in the form which satisfies Anna; even without a debate, even in the presence of resistance & Hungama in the House from any party for any reason. Why is this hurry? 


Had AAP didn't perform well in Delhi Election, All political parties would have preferred to left Lokpal bill for discussion after 2014 Parliamentary election.


What gets communicated to common men is not what someone tells but what he hides in his mind.

Anna movement at Jantar Mantar -April2011 & Ramlila Maidan August 2011 were successful due to huge participation of common men and thus resulted in pressure over Govt.& political parties to pretend something in favour of formation of Lokpal. Loksava passed the bill but due to “shortage of time” it couldn't be passed in the Rajyasava in December 2011. 

But due to ill health of Anna &/or some unknown reason December 2011 Hunger strike at MMRDA grounds Mumbai, public participation was not as much as desired & now politicians started to think that public has short memories. 

Both Govt. & opposition started to think- whatever Anna does; no one can replace them in electoral politics, so last 6 parliamentary sessions lapsed without any concrete step in the direction of formation of strong Lokpal. In last 2 years they never felt any pressure, they never get threatened. 

Team Anna and AAP are strength of each other because their goal is same and because they both are honest in their path. 

Anna’s movement creates awareness among masses; it inspires millions to opt for honest path.

Kejriwal and AAP compel other political parties to opt for new ways of honest politics and give importance to voice of honest members of their own party in their party forum.
In parliamentary democracy we need honest people, not only in one party but in all political parties. Anna’s path will motivate for honesty while AAP’s path will compel for it.

My wish is to see both Team anna & AAP members on the same stage as it was during Ramlila Maidan Agitation, but I know if my wish comes true it will weaken our struggle for honesty.
To opt for two different path by erstwhile Team Anna  to achieve same Goal is due to God's desire and definitely for good. It gives strength not weakens the struggle if all respect each others decision and avoid criticizing (as till now). 
LONG LIVE TEAM ANNA! LONG LIVE AAP!